AI Drives Small Business Buyers to Self-Serve as Most MSPs Stay Silent

[00:00:02] Two-thirds of MSPs don't mention AI anywhere on their website. That silence isn't the problem. The problem is the market just split into two, and the providers stuck in the middle are the ones who never noticed the ground moving. The S&B market has quietly split into two buyers who no longer overlap. One buying a managed outcome, one buying the cheapest self-serve tool. And the memory price shock is now widening that gap fast.

[00:00:29] The MSP still selling an undifferentiated middle of boxes plus support is being squeezed off both edges. And the winning firm picks a side and gets hardware cost risk off its own books either way. This is the Business of Tech. I'm Dave Sobel. Here's a change in how small businesses buy technology and a matching gap in how their providers sell it. It's happening quietly on its own right now.

[00:00:59] We start with Business Insider, which looked at how small companies are actually using AI today. The picture isn't a pilot program or a boardroom strategy. It's survival. Small businesses are reaching for AI directly, on their own, to cut costs and stay afloat.

[00:01:16] The reporting profiles a company called Sparkles Homes, where the founder describes leaning on AI automation to keep the business lean, handling work that would otherwise have meant hiring. Nobody sold him a managed service. He did it himself, because the math of his business demanded it.

[00:01:33] And Sparkles Homes is not the exception. It's the pattern. Channel EDE, reporting across the managed services channel, put a number on how far this behavior has already spread. Roughly 90% of companies now have people using personal AI tools at work. 90%.

[00:01:52] Brought in by employees themselves, one login at a time, usually without anyone in charge ever having signed off. It's already inside nearly every business you can name, and it arrived through the side door. Now flip the camera around to providers, because we went and measured them. The business of tech analyzed roughly 3,000 MSP websites, every AI claim in their public marketing copy, machine-graded and validated against human labeling.

[00:02:20] And to be clear about what this is, it measures what MSPs say they sell, not what they're capable of. It's preliminary, and every number I'm about to give you is a lower bound. Here's the first one. Two-thirds of MSPs don't mention AI at all. Across roughly 2,900 websites, 68% have no AI mention anywhere on the site.

[00:02:44] Even among the larger, more visible MSPs, the ones you'd expect to be out in front, it's about half. The AI gold rush you keep hearing about has not reached most MSP marketing. And of the ones that do show up, most are talking, not selling. Only about 1 in 7 MSPs market-wide has a real, scoped AI offer, a named service or a defined engagement.

[00:03:08] About 1 in 4 among the established tier. Everyone else is either silent or just commenting on AI in a blog post. And then there's what the sellers are naming. Of the MSPs that name a platform in their AI offer, about 85% name Microsoft Copilot. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic? They're all rounding errors. The providers who've entered the conversation are, overwhelmingly, pointing at someone else's product.

[00:03:36] So hold it all together. Buyers moving on their own from the bottom up. AI already inside 90% of companies through the side door. Two-thirds of providers not in the conversation at all. And the ones who are mostly naming the same single platform. That's the picture, before we said a word about why. If you're listening to this and you haven't hit follow yet, on Apple Podcasts, search Business of Tech. Takes 5 seconds, and you'll get the next episode automatically.

[00:04:06] If you've been watching the backup market, you know pricing has gotten complicated. Veeam feels like legacy overhead. Some of the newer platforms have gotten expensive fast. Comet Backup is what I keep seeing MSPs land on when they want modern backup without the modern price tag. Bring your own storage, control your costs, and run it your way. Comet Backup is built for MSPs who want flexibility without the vendor dependency.

[00:04:34] Check them out at cometbackup.com. So far, we've watched buyers and providers drift apart on their own. What turns that drift into a hard split, a genuine fault line, isn't AI at all. It's sitting underneath every laptop, every server, every device in these businesses. The price of memory. Start with what just happened at Apple. The Verge reported that Apple raised prices across its Macs, iPads, and more. Not by a few dollars, but by hundreds.

[00:05:02] And the reason it gave was blunt. A shortage of the memory and storage that goes inside the machines. When the most powerful hardware company on Earth says it can no longer absorb a component cost and has to pass it on to the buyer, that's not a blip. That's the floor moving. And the size of the move is the part that should land. CNBC, describing a memory crunch it called existential for the small guys, put a number on it.

[00:05:26] The DRAM in those devices, take a common 8GB module, has gone from around $35 to roughly $300. Nearly 9 times over. Now here's why this doesn't clear next quarter. Business Insider reports that the AI data center build-out is on track to pull 15-20% of all consumer memory manufacturing capability away from consumer devices and into data centers in 2027.

[00:05:54] So the same appetite driving today's shortage has a second, larger wave already scheduled. The chips are being bid away by somebody with deeper pockets, and the bidding isn't stopping. And notice the loop closing here. The same AI wave that sent those small businesses reaching for their own cheap tools is the very thing bidding the memory away from their next laptop. AI is manufacturing the demand at one end and inflating the cost of hardware at the other.

[00:06:21] One force pressing both walls of the middle inward at once. And here's the mechanism that matters. A rising box price doesn't land on both kinds of buyer the same way. For the cost-driven owner, the one already reaching for cheap tools to stay afloat, a pricer machine is one more reason to defer the refresh and do it himself. For the buyer who only ever wanted an outcome, the box was never the point.

[00:06:47] So its price just accelerates the move to whoever sells the result instead of the hardware. Same force, opposite reactions. So if the memory market is the force doing the sorting, the question is who gets caught standing in between it. And that's a mirror the MSP has to hold up to itself. So put the MSP in that picture, because the spot most providers are standing in is the one spot the ground is opening under.

[00:07:15] TechIsle went and studied this directly and named it without flinching. The small business technology market has split into two markets, a high-touch managed outcome segment and a low-cost commoditized one. And in their words, most partners go-to-market has not caught up. Read what that actually says about the provider. There is a buyer who wants an outcome owned for them. And a buyer who wants the cheapest possible tool and will run it himself.

[00:07:43] What there is no longer is a buyer for the thing in between, the undifferentiated bundle of boxes plus support at a blended monthly price. And the middle is exactly where the largest share of MSPs still sells. Remember what our own marketing scan found? Well, two-thirds not in the AI conversation at all. And most of the rest just pointing at Copilot. It's not a provider position for the top tier or the bottom one. That's a provider standing in the gap.

[00:08:12] At the precise moment, the gap is widening. And here's the part that should change the response, because it says the top tier is real and hungry. Babbel, in its own Technology Performance Index, and this is Babbel's survey, so weigh it accordingly, found that 88% of small and mid-sized businesses call technology critical for their success, while only 47% feel confident enough to actually deploy it. Think about that gap. Nearly every business believes this matters,

[00:08:42] and fewer than half trust themselves to do it. That difference is the managed outcome tier waving its arms. Choosing to serve it isn't a retreat from the commoditized buyer. It's walking towards the buyer who's telling you out loud that they can't do this alone. And the market is already starting to price the split. MSP 360, in its own announcement, just locked in pricing for its MSP partners, no automatic increases, and made the promise itself to the product.

[00:09:11] When a vendor turns your cost won't move into a selling point, that's the tell. Cost risk is becoming the thing you either own on purpose or eat by accident. So here's the choice, and it's one about which business you're actually in. You can commit to the managed outcome tier, sell the result, own it, and pull hardware out of your flat monthly number so it becomes a transparent line the client sees and owns, with the component price risk sitting where it belongs,

[00:09:40] instead of quietly bleeding your margin. Or you can keep defending the all-in, box-inclusive middle and get ground down between a specialist reaching down from above and a self-serve buyer walking away below you, while the memory market keeps pulling the two of them further apart. And the honest place to start isn't with your client's business at all. It's with your own. This episode is brought to you by Control Map.

[00:10:07] Growing MSPs are using Control Map to build recurring revenue by expanding their GRC services. Starting now, Control Map is offering a free plan for MSPs looking to get started with providing compliance as a service. Create a free account and run an assessment. Track key items like policies, risks, and evidence in one place. It's a practical way to prove value to a client before deciding to expand your compliance offering. Try Control Map for free today.

[00:10:34] Visit scalepad.com slash Dave to get started. That's scalepad.com slash Dave. Why do we care? Because before you can sell a side of this split, you have to pick one for your own shop. Your marketing probably hasn't. Go read your own website the way our scan read 3,000 others. Does it name a scoped outcome you own or does it hedge in the undifferentiated middle?

[00:11:04] And sit with the absence we found across the whole channel. Almost nobody markets that they use AI to run their clients' IT better, which means the first provider who can prove that about their own operation has already claimed the outcome tier before saying a word about price. So what to consider? Grade your own site the way the scan graded the market. Pull up your homepage and services pages and mark, honestly,

[00:11:31] whether a stranger could tell in 10 seconds which tier you sell. A named, scoped outcome, or a blended bundle of boxes plus support. If you land in the middle, you've just found yourself in the same gap two-thirds of the market is sitting in, and you found it before a client did. That audit is free, takes an afternoon, and it's the first thing that has to change because you cannot sell a position you haven't declared. Externalize your own hardware risk before you pitch it as a service.

[00:12:01] If you're choosing the outcome tier, restructure your own agreements first. Pull hardware out of your flat monthly number internally so that the memory price shock stops landing on your margin and starts sitting where it belongs. You'll deliver the client version of this far more convincingly once you've already run the move on your own P&L, and the reprice is easier to defend at renewal than to explain after a quarter of quiet bleeding. Close the absence.

[00:12:28] Make we use AI to run your IT better true, then say it. The scan found essentially nobody marketing AI applied to their own delivery, only AI sold as the client's revenue line. That's an open lane. Instrument one internal workflow with AI, measure what it saved, and turn that into the outcome tier proof no competitor is making. It's the credential that separates a provider who owns the results from one who resells Copilot,

[00:12:57] and right now, it's unclaimed. If this trend continues within the next 12 to 18 months, the MSPs whose own marketing sits still in the undifferentiated middle will be the ones a split market literally can't place. While the providers who picked aside and can point to AI running their own delivery as proof will be taking the confident gap buyers before price is ever discussed. This is the Business of Tech.

[00:13:27] Want more from the Business of Tech? Join Business of Tech Plus for ad-free episodes, early interviews, extended cuts, subscriber-only shows, and exclusive member perks and analysis. Sign up at businessof.tech slash plus. And follow this show on your podcast app, and if you're on YouTube, hit subscribe and the bell so you never miss a story. Reviews and comments help spread the word too. Interested in advertising?

[00:13:55] Head to mspradio.com slash engage. The Business of Tech is written and produced by me, Dave Sobel, under ethics guidelines posted at businessof.tech. Thanks for listening. I'll see you on the next episode.