Dave Sobel and channel expert Ryan Morris discuss the aftermath of the CrowdStrike incident and the importance of focusing on software quality in the tech industry. They emphasize the need for technology vendors to prioritize reliability, stability, security, and manageability in their products to prevent future outages and vulnerabilities. The conversation highlights the role of MSPs and channel companies in ensuring that the technology they offer is reliable and professionally supported, ultimately benefiting both the vendors and the end-users.
Ryan Morris emphasizes the importance of channel partners choosing vendors based on the quality and reliability of their products, rather than just the latest features or pricing. He stresses the need for vendors to take responsibility for the quality of their software and provide effective support to channel partners in case of issues. The discussion also touches on the significance of industry-wide initiatives like the "secure by design" pledge to promote software quality and security across the tech ecosystem.
The conversation shifts to the impact of AI on IT careers, with both Dave and Ryan expressing optimism about AI's role in enhancing human capabilities rather than replacing jobs. They discuss the importance of leveraging AI as a tool to make professionals more productive and efficient in their roles. Additionally, Dave clarifies his approach to selecting tools for an MSP business, focusing on compatibility with modern API-driven interfaces and the importance of selecting tools that align with the business's long-term goals.
The episode concludes with a preview of an upcoming interview with Srini Koushik of Rackspace, where he discusses Rackspace's AI framework and their focus on responsible AI implementation. The conversation highlights Rackspace's commitment to symbiotic, secure, and sustainable AI solutions, emphasizing the importance of responsible AI practices in the tech industry.
Supported by: https://salesbuildr.com/
💼 All Our Sponsors
Support the vendors who support the show:
👉 https://businessof.tech/sponsors/
🚀 Join Business of Tech Plus
Get exclusive access to investigative reports, vendor analysis, leadership briefings, and more.
👉 https://businessof.tech/plus
🎧 Subscribe to the Business of Tech
Want the show on your favorite podcast app or prefer the written versions of each story?
📲 https://www.businessof.tech/subscribe
📰 Story Links & Sources
Looking for the links from today’s stories?
Every episode script — with full source links — is posted at:
🎙 Want to Be a Guest?
Pitch your story or appear on Business of Tech: Daily 10-Minute IT Services Insights:
💬 https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/businessoftech
🔗 Follow Business of Tech
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28908079
YouTube: https://youtube.com/mspradio
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/businessof.tech
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mspradio
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@businessoftech
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mspradionews
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
[00:00:12] [SPEAKER_02]: Well, we have to talk about CrowdStrike.
[00:00:15] [SPEAKER_02]: But instead of looking to the past, we'll talk about where we go from here.
[00:00:20] [SPEAKER_02]: Ryan Morris, channel expert and my co-host on Killing It joins me today.
[00:00:25] [SPEAKER_02]: Welcome to the Business of Tech Lounge, the live version of the Business of Tech podcast.
[00:00:30] [SPEAKER_02]: It's Wednesday, July 24th, 2024.
[00:00:34] [SPEAKER_02]: And I'm Dave Sobel.
[00:00:35] [SPEAKER_02]: We'll be taking questions and comments throughout the show to make sure to put them in chat,
[00:00:40] [SPEAKER_02]: in particular with a topic like this.
[00:00:42] [SPEAKER_02]: I would love to hear from you.
[00:00:43] [SPEAKER_02]: I think we've got a lot of thoughts on where we might go, and it'll be a lively discussion.
[00:00:48] [SPEAKER_02]: There is a dedicated questions section in the show with listeners submitted questions,
[00:00:54] [SPEAKER_02]: but we will take those comments and questions at any point during the show.
[00:00:58] [SPEAKER_02]: I want to thank SalesBuilder, our Patreon sponsor, who support makes this show possible.
[00:01:04] [SPEAKER_02]: Focus on your IT sales workflow with the power of automation, and visit them at salesbuilder.com.
[00:01:11] [SPEAKER_02]: That's B-U-I-L-D-R dot com.
[00:01:14] [SPEAKER_02]: And a reminder, I am watching that chat.
[00:01:18] [SPEAKER_02]: So let's dive into our top story.
[00:01:20] [SPEAKER_02]: We have to talk about the CrowdStrike Incident.
[00:01:23] [SPEAKER_02]: Not because we want to spend a lot of time on the history.
[00:01:26] [SPEAKER_02]: I already covered that on Monday.
[00:01:28] [SPEAKER_02]: But for those of you who might not have known, those 78 minutes where an update from CrowdStrike was out in the wild
[00:01:34] [SPEAKER_02]: and it took over 8.5 million PCs,
[00:01:38] [SPEAKER_02]: because one of the largest IT outages we've ever seen.
[00:01:42] [SPEAKER_02]: Recovery is still ongoing as Delta Airlines, among others, is still working on cleaning that all up.
[00:01:48] [SPEAKER_02]: But I don't want to dive into the what happened.
[00:01:50] [SPEAKER_02]: If you missed it, as on Monday's show I did a deep dive on what happened with the particular incident.
[00:01:56] [SPEAKER_02]: But instead, I want to talk about Jen Easterly's comments on LinkedIn.
[00:02:03] [SPEAKER_02]: Now, Easterly is the head of CISA and gave a lot of thought in her ode to an outage
[00:02:08] [SPEAKER_02]: of exactly where we might go as an industry and what started this.
[00:02:13] [SPEAKER_02]: Her basic premise?
[00:02:14] [SPEAKER_02]: We have a software quality problem, not a hacking one.
[00:02:18] [SPEAKER_02]: Let's pull from her comments that I covered on Monday's episode.
[00:03:07] [SPEAKER_02]: The other thing I know is that anyone who consumes tech, yep that's basically all of us,
[00:03:13] [SPEAKER_02]: should demand that those technology and software manufacturers do exactly that.
[00:03:20] [SPEAKER_02]: So, to have a conversation about this I want to bring on my co-host from Killing It, Ryan Morris.
[00:03:26] [SPEAKER_02]: Ryan, thanks for joining me today.
[00:03:30] [SPEAKER_03]: I just kind of had to do a little bit of that because it feels when I see you on a digital
[00:03:34] [SPEAKER_03]: screen like this that's built into my DNA now so I'm very glad to be here sir.
[00:03:41] [SPEAKER_03]: Thank you very much for having me.
[00:03:42] [SPEAKER_02]: Well, I appreciate you joining me because in particular I thought your expertise around
[00:03:47] [SPEAKER_02]: thinking about channel and channel delivery would be super helpful for this conversation.
[00:03:52] [SPEAKER_02]: One of the things that I kind of want to start with a basic idea if we're talking about
[00:03:57] [SPEAKER_02]: software quality and we're thinking about the level of quality that's coming out of
[00:04:03] [SPEAKER_02]: manufacturers and if IT service providers, MSPs, whatever we want to talk about are
[00:04:07] [SPEAKER_02]: the delivery mechanisms for that they don't actually control the software.
[00:04:11] [SPEAKER_02]: How much control do you think MSPs and channel companies really have over the quality?
[00:04:18] [SPEAKER_03]: You know what, that's a really good question because it gets to the heart of why would somebody
[00:04:24] [SPEAKER_03]: agree to be in business with me. If I am a technology vendor, I try to recruit partners,
[00:04:30] [SPEAKER_03]: I try to sell through partners, I try to get them to take my products to market
[00:04:35] [SPEAKER_03]: that will benefit them and it will benefit me. We've asked that question extensively in research
[00:04:41] [SPEAKER_03]: and really tried to get down to the heart of the issue. Why would an independent company that could
[00:04:47] [SPEAKER_03]: choose to work with any vendor, why would they choose to work with you? There's a lot of people
[00:04:53] [SPEAKER_03]: who gut level, they think well because I have the best technology, cutting edge, most advanced
[00:04:58] [SPEAKER_03]: feature function rich, I have the best solution that's why people work with me. That is
[00:05:03] [SPEAKER_03]: absolutely not true. The A number one reason why a channel partner would agree to work with a vendor
[00:05:10] [SPEAKER_03]: is that the software or technology, whatever it is that they are getting into business with
[00:05:16] [SPEAKER_03]: does what it promises it will do reliably and professionally without the risk of embarrassing
[00:05:24] [SPEAKER_03]: me with my install base as the channel partner. I cannot tolerate bleeding edge technology
[00:05:32] [SPEAKER_03]: that I will deploy in my install base especially as an MSP with a fixed cost contract agreement
[00:05:38] [SPEAKER_03]: with those end users. I can't bring in unproven things, I can't bring in the latest
[00:05:45] [SPEAKER_03]: most advanced capabilities and just pebble in the pond and see what happens with the ripples.
[00:05:53] [SPEAKER_03]: That's malpractice, right? You just can't do that. Don't embarrass me with my customers.
[00:05:58] [SPEAKER_03]: That's the very first thing that we have to do. I believe that speaks to the quality of the product
[00:06:06] [SPEAKER_03]: and to the support that is available for the people in the channel who take our technologies
[00:06:12] [SPEAKER_03]: to market as vendors. If you cannot build a perfect product, I fully admit that's not possible,
[00:06:20] [SPEAKER_03]: right? I get it. This is why we all have jobs in the channel. Technology is not perfect and
[00:06:25] [SPEAKER_03]: never will be perfect, but if you can't do that then you must provide the downstream capabilities
[00:06:33] [SPEAKER_03]: to react and recover as effectively as possible. That's what we should expect. I will call that
[00:06:41] [SPEAKER_03]: the channel partners Bill of Rights. You deserve partners who will build good product,
[00:06:48] [SPEAKER_03]: support it extensively and accelerate your access as the channel partner to escalated levels of
[00:06:56] [SPEAKER_03]: support. If we can't count on that from a vendor, doesn't matter how cool their software is,
[00:07:03] [SPEAKER_03]: doesn't matter what the margins on it are, doesn't matter how broadly distributed.
[00:07:17] [SPEAKER_02]: Interestingly, if I think about what's going on then from a CrowdStrike perspective,
[00:07:24] [SPEAKER_02]: I don't think CrowdStrike necessarily did anything wrong after the mistake, right? After the point
[00:07:33] [SPEAKER_02]: where they hit, where they realized they made a mistake. I think where the problem was is the
[00:07:38] [SPEAKER_02]: earlier part. It is we don't know and I want to be super clear that I'm speculating, but I can
[00:07:44] [SPEAKER_02]: feel reasonably comfortable in speculating that well something broke in the quality assurance
[00:07:49] [SPEAKER_02]: testing process, right? Because I can know that at some level it didn't go the way that they were
[00:07:55] [SPEAKER_02]: expecting it to. By the way, if we dig into some of the way that very large companies do this,
[00:08:00] [SPEAKER_02]: they often deploy in a small geography or a small number of clients, not everybody, right? We can
[00:08:08] [SPEAKER_02]: definitely recognize that there is an issue there from a delivery of quality perspective.
[00:08:13] [SPEAKER_02]: Let's talk industry-wide. What can we do industry-wide to focus on quality here and get better
[00:08:21] [SPEAKER_02]: visibility into that? Because if I'm a channel partner and I'm working with CrowdStrike,
[00:08:26] [SPEAKER_02]: I don't know how their QA process works. I don't get visibility into that until it breaks.
[00:08:33] [SPEAKER_02]: Is there a technique from it? Let's start industry-wise before we get to individual
[00:08:37] [SPEAKER_02]: provider. Is there something as an industry we can do here to make this product,
[00:08:41] [SPEAKER_03]: to increase quality here? You know what? You're exactly right. It has to begin at the industry
[00:08:47] [SPEAKER_03]: level because you and I, we can tilt at windmills all day long about what my issues are as an
[00:08:54] [SPEAKER_03]: individual provider and a very large globally distributed company, they're not going to change
[00:08:59] [SPEAKER_03]: for my request, right? It has to begin at the industry level and I am really glad you brought
[00:09:04] [SPEAKER_03]: up the Jen Easterly commentary on this because she says something in there that I agree with
[00:09:11] [SPEAKER_03]: very passionately. Security by design or quality by design, right? A pledge from an industry
[00:09:20] [SPEAKER_03]: perspective that says it's not cool when you make a software product and then offload the QA and
[00:09:27] [SPEAKER_03]: testing and support costs onto the customer or onto the channel. I believe that that is industry
[00:09:36] [SPEAKER_03]: practice for a vendor to sell a product that is not ready for prime time. Now, I get why they do.
[00:09:44] [SPEAKER_03]: It's faster to market. We don't want to be the last one to take advantage of this.
[00:09:48] [SPEAKER_03]: It's less expensive. It's less overhead and operating expense for me as the vendor.
[00:09:54] [SPEAKER_03]: I get why it happens but it's not acceptable. I think that as an industry we need to take
[00:10:01] [SPEAKER_03]: a step back from bringing the fastest to market with the most features with the lowest cost and
[00:10:08] [SPEAKER_03]: that whole you want it now, you want it fast, you want it great quality, you want a great price.
[00:10:14] [SPEAKER_03]: And we always say you can have two but you can't have all three of those points of the value
[00:10:18] [SPEAKER_03]: conversation. As an industry we've been lying to ourselves saying no, you can get it fast
[00:10:25] [SPEAKER_03]: and quality and cheap. You can have everything you want. No, you can't and let's be honest about that.
[00:10:33] [SPEAKER_03]: So I think that initiatives like the idea of security, secure by design, quality by design,
[00:10:42] [SPEAKER_03]: I think that holistically we all need to buy into that and begin to push back on vendors who say,
[00:10:50] [SPEAKER_03]: well, I make the product and then you just make sure it works.
[00:10:54] [SPEAKER_03]: No, the value chain is an interdependent ecosystem. If one part of it gets sick, everybody pays a
[00:11:03] [SPEAKER_03]: price. If the vendor sells substandard technology and passes along the responsibility to the MSP
[00:11:13] [SPEAKER_03]: or the partner channel and then the partner channel has to fix it without additional compensation
[00:11:21] [SPEAKER_03]: with their shouldering all the risk for radically lower margins in that conversation,
[00:11:27] [SPEAKER_03]: that's not healthy and it can't sustain. And if you don't fix it,
[00:11:32] [SPEAKER_03]: dot, dot, dot channel partners either drop you or they go out of business because they've
[00:11:37] [SPEAKER_03]: had a risk realization or they just can't make enough money to shoulder all of that responsibility.
[00:11:44] [SPEAKER_03]: At which point, everybody thinks, oh, that's sad for the channel partner, they paid the price.
[00:11:50] [SPEAKER_03]: Yeah, but I've been a vendor for very many years and if my partners go away for any reason
[00:11:56] [SPEAKER_03]: without forewarning, without my ability to shift and reallocate that coverage
[00:12:01] [SPEAKER_03]: to another participant, by definition, I pay the price as the vendor. I'm not isolated from
[00:12:09] [SPEAKER_03]: that sickness. I pay the price because I just got diminished capacity. Some of my customers are
[00:12:14] [SPEAKER_03]: left uncovered and I'm the one who's going to suffer the brand impact for that lack of coverage
[00:12:21] [SPEAKER_03]: in the marketplace. So I believe we start there as an industry and we say let's be good to each
[00:12:28] [SPEAKER_03]: other. Mutually beneficial ecosystems will make everybody more money. We start there and then
[00:12:36] [SPEAKER_03]: let's have a scorecard. Let's have, you know, you and I, we've grown up in a world of magic
[00:12:42] [SPEAKER_03]: quadrants and waves and all of these different ways of measuring the quality of a vendor offering.
[00:12:50] [SPEAKER_03]: You notice how most of that is pre-market, right? It's do you have the best technology
[00:12:56] [SPEAKER_03]: and do you have the ability to execute on developing and delivering that technology?
[00:13:01] [SPEAKER_03]: Do you notice how those things don't include aftermarket? That's not okay. Like that, that's just
[00:13:07] [SPEAKER_02]: not acceptable. In fact, this is what I want to ask you. So you're somebody that spends a lot of
[00:13:12] [SPEAKER_02]: time advising channel companies on the way to go to market. And I, you know, so I'm going to say
[00:13:16] [SPEAKER_02]: I'm out of that side of the game long enough as just an independent analyst to say,
[00:13:21] [SPEAKER_02]: look, I can see the actual opportunity here for a couple of channel vendors. The channel vendor
[00:13:26] [SPEAKER_02]: that says, you know what? We're not going to just leave you hanging. We're actually going to
[00:13:33] [SPEAKER_02]: assume some non-zero responsibility in terms of labor restoration that we will help you and
[00:13:40] [SPEAKER_02]: guarantee at some level, not just be like, oh, we might give you a month's credit or
[00:13:45] [SPEAKER_02]: something along those lines. But we're actually going to say in the event of outage,
[00:13:49] [SPEAKER_02]: we're going to stand with you with some warranty. Right? You'll get, we may not be able to make
[00:13:54] [SPEAKER_02]: you whole, but we'll make you, we'll invest in you. We make a mistake. We're going to help
[00:13:59] [SPEAKER_02]: you with some monetary credit. Are you ready to advise channel businesses the vendor side that
[00:14:06] [SPEAKER_02]: this is a competitive advantage? Am I right in highlighting that like, there are some vendors
[00:14:11] [SPEAKER_02]: here that could move to make a real difference with an insurance style approach.
[00:14:17] [SPEAKER_03]: You are 100% correct in that strategy. Think about it. If I raise my expectations, right? My advice
[00:14:25] [SPEAKER_03]: to the channel community is to have higher expectations of the vendor partners that you
[00:14:31] [SPEAKER_03]: get into business with and insist that they demonstrate their quality assurance to you
[00:14:38] [SPEAKER_03]: and insist that they convince you that if and when something goes wrong, this is the way that we
[00:14:46] [SPEAKER_03]: will handle it. And we will make sure that you will be okay. If in the process of that conversation,
[00:14:51] [SPEAKER_03]: a vendor says, you know what? I'm not willing to warranty my solution to the extent that I
[00:14:56] [SPEAKER_03]: will make you whole if and when things go wrong. My inevitable reaction to that is
[00:15:04] [SPEAKER_03]: so apparently you are afraid that something serious is going to go wrong and that the implications of
[00:15:11] [SPEAKER_03]: that are going to be big and you don't want to shoulder the expense. You know what? Thank you
[00:15:16] [SPEAKER_03]: very much for telling me you don't have confidence in your own product. I wouldn't have
[00:15:21] [SPEAKER_03]: confidence in it if you don't either, right? I believe that that is a phenomenal opportunity
[00:15:27] [SPEAKER_03]: for distinguishing. Don't tell me you've got three more features. Don't tell me that you've
[00:15:32] [SPEAKER_03]: got a special pricing promotion for the month of May. Don't tell me that our brand is the biggest
[00:15:37] [SPEAKER_03]: and the best and customers are clamoring to buy my solution. Tell me we are in this together
[00:15:44] [SPEAKER_03]: and what that means is not only will I give you good technology, I will enable you to sell it
[00:15:51] [SPEAKER_03]: and support it effectively yourself. I will advise you on how to build a stable lucrative
[00:15:56] [SPEAKER_03]: and growing business around the platform of my technology and I am a grown-up. I acknowledge
[00:16:05] [SPEAKER_03]: that things might go wrong and if they do, here is precisely how I will make you okay in that process.
[00:16:13] [SPEAKER_03]: If vendor A says that and vendor B says no, no, no, I won't warranty this stuff,
[00:16:18] [SPEAKER_03]: the decision on which vendor to go with just got really easy.
[00:16:22] [SPEAKER_02]: I'm going to laugh and go, there's now a video of us talking about this that can be shared with
[00:16:26] [SPEAKER_02]: vendors of our approach. The other thing I'm going to highlight that is the SISA has put the list of
[00:16:32] [SPEAKER_02]: companies that have signed their Secure By Design pledge online. That's available. We'll put the
[00:16:40] [SPEAKER_02]: URL in the description for those watching the recording and throw it up here on screen
[00:16:45] [SPEAKER_02]: in a banner for those that are watching. What we'll actually say is you can now look and
[00:16:51] [SPEAKER_02]: find the vendors that have signed it. From a channel perspective, kudos to them. Huntress has already
[00:16:59] [SPEAKER_02]: signed, enable his sign disclosure. I'm a shareholder. I always feel important to be transparent with
[00:17:06] [SPEAKER_02]: that. There's only a handful of channel companies that have actually signed the Secure By Design
[00:17:14] [SPEAKER_02]: pledge. Right? I'm going to ask, we've talked a lot from an industry like a wide industry
[00:17:20] [SPEAKER_02]: perspective, but a lot of our listeners, people listening to show right now are smaller or mid-sized
[00:17:26] [SPEAKER_02]: organizations that we consider themselves a channel company or an MSP. Someone that's designing
[00:17:31] [SPEAKER_02]: that and you alluded to it right at the beginning. A big multinational company is not going to
[00:17:36] [SPEAKER_02]: change their policy for that solution provider. What can that solution provider do in the
[00:17:43] [SPEAKER_02]: short term in your opinion to like zig while others are zagging right now? What can they
[00:17:50] [SPEAKER_02]: do differently based on this quality problem? That's a great question and I'm going to admit
[00:17:56] [SPEAKER_03]: that my answer is going to, it's going to sound like I'm putting extra work on your shoulders
[00:18:01] [SPEAKER_03]: because a little bit that's true. The old adage always be closing. Always be evolving
[00:18:09] [SPEAKER_03]: is the thing. As an industry we are infatuated with the concept of standardization and
[00:18:16] [SPEAKER_03]: stability, packaged offerings with best practice designed in with continuity over time. I get it
[00:18:24] [SPEAKER_03]: right? I understand why that is true but the minute you stop evaluating where you could push
[00:18:31] [SPEAKER_03]: the edges of your current offering, where you might improve in the margins, where you might
[00:18:36] [SPEAKER_03]: get a little bit better at the offering you do, the minute you stop doing that is the
[00:18:42] [SPEAKER_03]: minute you volunteer to be a dinosaur in your own industry. You can't sell the same thing you
[00:18:48] [SPEAKER_03]: sold five years ago unless you can validate that it is still best practice. God bless them.
[00:18:57] [SPEAKER_03]: There are some vendors who year after year after year continue to lead the way and they are
[00:19:03] [SPEAKER_03]: indeed still best practice in their category. Kudos, that's great but don't assume,
[00:19:08] [SPEAKER_03]: don't hope that that's going to be true. Always be researching and testing out the vendors that you
[00:19:16] [SPEAKER_03]: might swap in and out of your packaged offering. What we have to do is to admit
[00:19:23] [SPEAKER_03]: you and I don't sell dot matrix printers anymore, you and I don't sell 2001 versions of systems
[00:19:30] [SPEAKER_03]: admin software. What was best in class at one point is not permanent and in order to acknowledge that
[00:19:40] [SPEAKER_03]: and live within that, you and I did a project years ago where we argued for one of the
[00:19:47] [SPEAKER_03]: fundamental principles of remaining perpetually relevant which is the idea that I refer to as
[00:19:53] [SPEAKER_03]: argue in the alternative. What I mean by that is argue against your own brand offering, be your own
[00:20:02] [SPEAKER_03]: competitor and say what are your weaknesses and why would a customer not choose you and what is
[00:20:08] [SPEAKER_03]: the gray area that you haven't yet fully solved for your customers? If you're the one challenging
[00:20:15] [SPEAKER_03]: yourself like that, you're going to find out what's a problem before it's embarrassing in
[00:20:20] [SPEAKER_03]: front of a customer or causes a loss to a competitor. You've got to research the alternatives, you have
[00:20:26] [SPEAKER_03]: to test your own offering and then you have to be willing to do the change management even though we
[00:20:34] [SPEAKER_03]: all cringe at that concept, unplugging vendor A and replacing them with vendor B at any component
[00:20:41] [SPEAKER_03]: level of the stack that we've baked our cake 100 years ago and we don't want to mess with
[00:20:49] [SPEAKER_03]: the recipe yet except that it's going to get stale eventually unless you are conscientiously proving
[00:20:57] [SPEAKER_03]: that it is still best in class. So in addition to just operating your business and working with the
[00:21:05] [SPEAKER_03]: vendors you're currently in business with to ensure that you have the best deployment
[00:21:08] [SPEAKER_03]: and the best support mechanisms, you must also actually do the things that would justify
[00:21:17] [SPEAKER_03]: when you want to actually make a change and then be very good at onboarding that new vendor doing the
[00:21:26] [SPEAKER_03]: two systems in parallel to verify that they are stable, doing a cutover process that minimizes
[00:21:33] [SPEAKER_03]: disruption and risk potential for your customers. I guarantee there's half of the audience that
[00:21:39] [SPEAKER_03]: will listen to this that just literally broke out in a sweat when I described that. That's
[00:21:45] [SPEAKER_03]: the way we used to do things and as MSPs we said to ourselves we don't need to do that because we
[00:21:50] [SPEAKER_03]: have standardization and stabilization until you leave it just a little too long and then it becomes
[00:21:58] [SPEAKER_03]: yesterday's news and it smells like fish and you can't rest on your laurels. Well implied in what
[00:22:05] [SPEAKER_02]: you just said is something that I want to call out explicitly and in some cases that's removal
[00:22:09] [SPEAKER_02]: of vendors. I think that oftentimes too many solution providers are leaning into having
[00:22:15] [SPEAKER_02]: everything, must have as many solutions as possible and one of the things I've been thinking
[00:22:21] [SPEAKER_02]: about a lot in terms of that you brought up kind of cake and cooking. I want to actually
[00:22:25] [SPEAKER_02]: refer to beer making for a moment here and there's a reason why the Germans have purity laws
[00:22:29] [SPEAKER_02]: right? That there are only four ingredients in beer is because if you make it overly complicated
[00:22:36] [SPEAKER_02]: it will ruin the batch and you can dilute it or in our case from a technology perspective
[00:22:42] [SPEAKER_02]: introduce other risks that are not necessarily ones that are worth bringing in. I've been thinking
[00:22:47] [SPEAKER_02]: a lot about this particularly when we talk about cybersecurity oftentimes I say it and I want to
[00:22:52] [SPEAKER_02]: say it a little bit differently this time is simplicity is good right? Being really great
[00:22:58] [SPEAKER_02]: at backup and disaster recovery and having a good incident plan might just mean literally
[00:23:03] [SPEAKER_02]: having a really good backup tool and not a lot else right? And then you may lean into multifactor
[00:23:09] [SPEAKER_02]: authentication and good training and not a million other tools and you might be decide to be really
[00:23:16] [SPEAKER_02]: good at just a few things and keep your recipe very, very simple because you've also not introduced
[00:23:24] [SPEAKER_02]: a whole bunch of things. I'm not meaning to knock on CrowdStrike here I'm just observing that
[00:23:29] [SPEAKER_02]: it was one more thing in the mix that could then break at a kernel level and that's what
[00:23:35] [SPEAKER_02]: happened. Yeah it could happen to any vendor but the way to reduce the possibility is reduce the
[00:23:41] [SPEAKER_02]: number of vendors in the mix that's just literally one way of making this better is by removing
[00:23:47] [SPEAKER_02]: that and I think it's important to think about that. I'm going to call out that we are going to
[00:23:51] [SPEAKER_02]: continue taking conversation and discussion here you know Ryan the one sort of to roll
[00:23:56] [SPEAKER_02]: up a little bit and end on this topic before we get into some general questions from the
[00:24:00] [SPEAKER_02]: audience is you know from a you know if you now that we have a moment to try to step back
[00:24:07] [SPEAKER_02]: and look at this I have come to the conclusion I think the quality conversation is the top one
[00:24:12] [SPEAKER_02]: is there something here or do you disagree with that or is there something else that we should be
[00:24:17] [SPEAKER_02]: focusing on as the learning coming out of this? I don't want to spend a bunch of we're not
[00:24:22] [SPEAKER_02]: blaming people because I think the response was very good it's how can we get better to
[00:24:26] [SPEAKER_03]: make sure these things happen less? You know what again I will agree with the analysis that Jen
[00:24:32] [SPEAKER_03]: Easterly had it's naive and childish to assume that everything is perfect and nothing will ever
[00:24:38] [SPEAKER_03]: break. We all wish that were true and some of us insist on that oh if you can't guarantee
[00:24:42] [SPEAKER_03]: absolute 100 quality don't be a child right like that's literally not possible.
[00:24:49] [SPEAKER_03]: Things will break and when they do what matters most is the quality of your response and
[00:24:54] [SPEAKER_03]: your reaction and these guys yes they had an outage and not a cyber hack it was just a good old
[00:25:01] [SPEAKER_03]: fashioned IT outage right? It happened but they responded professionally they've responded aggressively
[00:25:09] [SPEAKER_03]: they are doing very good things and we can probably learn some lessons from the way that
[00:25:14] [SPEAKER_03]: they are managing this stuff. I think that you are right and I'll roll it up like a half step
[00:25:21] [SPEAKER_03]: further quality is the issue secure by design security is a function of quality the fact that
[00:25:28] [SPEAKER_03]: your stuff is not vulnerable is equally your responsibility as a software vendor as when I
[00:25:35] [SPEAKER_03]: click on that button does it do what the code intended it to do right? Software quality must
[00:25:41] [SPEAKER_03]: also include not just performance but reliability stability security manageability each of these
[00:25:50] [SPEAKER_03]: factors is a component of a scorecard that I would use as an MSP to evaluate all of the
[00:25:57] [SPEAKER_03]: offers that are out there and insist that vendors step up and own their thing. You've heard me say
[00:26:04] [SPEAKER_03]: it before right? I think a vendor who ships a product that is inherently not stable or inherently
[00:26:10] [SPEAKER_03]: not secure right equal quality importance there that's malpractice on their part right?
[00:26:16] [SPEAKER_03]: That's akin to I sold you a car that had a phenomenal engine and great handling and really
[00:26:23] [SPEAKER_03]: comfortable bucket seats but you know what it didn't have brakes because you know what the safety part
[00:26:28] [SPEAKER_03]: of it that's my responsibility you can manage that yourself with an aftermarket bolt-on. No,
[00:26:35] [SPEAKER_03]: that's not okay we can't allow our industry to operate at a level that accepts that vendors
[00:26:42] [SPEAKER_03]: ship cars without brake systems and then it's okay because we'll step in and make it secure. No,
[00:26:49] [SPEAKER_03]: what we have to do is to insist on quality and vote with your feet right? Like vote with your
[00:26:57] [SPEAKER_03]: get up and leave if the vendor won't give you something that you can be confident in that you
[00:27:01] [SPEAKER_03]: can really bet your brand reputation and your revenue stream on find another vendor who could
[00:27:07] [SPEAKER_03]: and you know what the worst time to try and figure that out is right after the shit hit the fan.
[00:27:14] [SPEAKER_03]: That's not the right time to research. The right time to research, they always say the right time
[00:27:19] [SPEAKER_03]: to planetary was 20 years ago the second best time to planetary is right now start researching
[00:27:26] [SPEAKER_03]: have alternatives know what you would do if vendor A, B or C went kaput temporarily or
[00:27:34] [SPEAKER_03]: permanently right things happen if that happens what will you do that risk management and scenario
[00:27:40] [SPEAKER_03]: planning that's a component that McKinsey will charge you five million dollars to go through
[00:27:47] [SPEAKER_03]: that exercise as a consulting project even as SMBs we must admit that part of the professional
[00:27:55] [SPEAKER_03]: discipline is anticipating what could go wrong planning for how we will respond and scripting
[00:28:02] [SPEAKER_03]: the process from A to B that's well that's what we mean by being profession. We've given everybody
[00:28:09] [SPEAKER_02]: the homework from there right I'm going to ask you to stick around for questions we're going to
[00:28:12] [SPEAKER_02]: continue to take questions and comments in the chat if you're watching live remember if you
[00:28:16] [SPEAKER_02]: bring your question live you'll get a live response we really do enjoy taking the questions
[00:28:22] [SPEAKER_02]: and of course if you're watching the recording or you have it after time but you can always
[00:28:26] [SPEAKER_02]: submit them ahead of time. I've got our first question right I think you're going to like
[00:28:30] [SPEAKER_02]: this one it comes from Mr. Incredible on YouTube let's hear the question what are your thoughts on
[00:28:36] [SPEAKER_00]: how AI will impact IT careers like sysadmin network admin help desk etc or can you have a
[00:28:43] [SPEAKER_02]: guest on that would share their thoughts? Ryan I knew I'd have a guest on who probably had
[00:28:49] [SPEAKER_02]: some thoughts on this one do you want to take Mr. Incredible's question first?
[00:28:53] [SPEAKER_03]: Yeah absolutely I six months ago literally six months ago the world had a con niption fit and
[00:29:02] [SPEAKER_03]: said oh no AI will eliminate the need for software developers it will eliminate the need for help
[00:29:08] [SPEAKER_03]: desk it will eliminate the need for a lot of the jobs that we do A. that's really over
[00:29:15] [SPEAKER_03]: promising and under delivering for what is essentially literally like a gen 1.3 product
[00:29:21] [SPEAKER_03]: offering I know they call it 4.0 right but it is still gen 1.3 of the technology evolution
[00:29:29] [SPEAKER_03]: it's a tool it will not replace strategy it will not replace the understanding of a customer
[00:29:37] [SPEAKER_03]: environment it will not replace the interpersonal characteristics of trust and credibility it
[00:29:45] [SPEAKER_03]: will not eliminate the intuition or as the smart people say the heuristics of being able to
[00:29:53] [SPEAKER_03]: intuit like this seems like a different situation than what it might look like on the surface so I
[00:30:00] [SPEAKER_03]: need to respond differently I believe help desk there's a FAQs exist right like they always have
[00:30:06] [SPEAKER_03]: and when if you can use AI to make your FAQs more searchable and interactive cool that you're
[00:30:13] [SPEAKER_03]: raise the bar on what is automatable that's great but you will never eliminate the crisis
[00:30:20] [SPEAKER_03]: response responsibility you will never eliminate the I know I think what is the right answer but
[00:30:27] [SPEAKER_03]: I'm just not sure can you reassure me right you can't eliminate those aspects of the jobs that we
[00:30:34] [SPEAKER_03]: do AI is a tool and it will make good humans that are good at their jobs even better and more
[00:30:41] [SPEAKER_03]: productive at their jobs I do not believe in the foreseeable future that it will eliminate any of
[00:30:48] [SPEAKER_03]: these jobs it will make a software developer faster more productive it'll eliminate some quality
[00:30:55] [SPEAKER_03]: issues in the code that they deliver cool we all benefit from that but it will not eliminate the
[00:31:01] [SPEAKER_03]: job of the software developer because it's not just about I need to write good code you know
[00:31:07] [SPEAKER_03]: that whole requirements discovery part of the software development process I know where I have
[00:31:14] [SPEAKER_03]: to ask the customer no really like what is it you actually want this thing to do AI will never be
[00:31:22] [SPEAKER_03]: able to do that in the foreseeable future because it does not understand who we're talking to
[00:31:28] [SPEAKER_03]: and how to intuit tone of voice and to interpret all of those non-language symbols and
[00:31:37] [SPEAKER_03]: and the unspoken parts of reactions and body language that is your job that's my job right
[00:31:44] [SPEAKER_03]: like we will be better at our jobs when AT enhance when when AI enhances us but it's not going to
[00:31:52] [SPEAKER_02]: take our jobs yeah and I'm falling into a similar camp on this and what's interesting I've been
[00:31:57] [SPEAKER_02]: having a lot of conversations with AI people that are deploying products and I find that the closer
[00:32:02] [SPEAKER_02]: they are to the model developers meaning the people at open AI for example or anthropic are the
[00:32:08] [SPEAKER_02]: ones that are talking about completely replacing humans but when I get to people that are actually
[00:32:13] [SPEAKER_02]: building products on top of the models the ones that are actually implementing models in
[00:32:18] [SPEAKER_02]: businesses they're having conversations that look much more like we are augmenting humans we
[00:32:23] [SPEAKER_02]: are making them better we are not replacing it I think that's important because by the way let's
[00:32:28] [SPEAKER_02]: observe we're all people that believe in that sort of delivery of advice through a channel
[00:32:34] [SPEAKER_02]: if you believe in that model which most of us do and history has proven us to be right
[00:32:40] [SPEAKER_02]: we will find then that those people are too far separated from customers to understand the
[00:32:45] [SPEAKER_02]: way technology works in the field in actual production so for mr. Grebel specifically to
[00:32:51] [SPEAKER_02]: answer your question how do I think it's going to impact it I think it's going to make great
[00:32:56] [SPEAKER_02]: engineers network designers network help us people help those people it's going to make great ones
[00:33:01] [SPEAKER_02]: even better it's going to make average ones better and it's going to increase the on ramp
[00:33:08] [SPEAKER_02]: for those that are less skilled to get to average now we will need to continue to invest in
[00:33:15] [SPEAKER_02]: those non-skilled people as they become average they will need to understand critical thinking
[00:33:20] [SPEAKER_02]: better but then that is also a good opportunity for senior people to be mentoring and and coaching
[00:33:26] [SPEAKER_02]: and working with junior ones so I look at this and say it seems all like good opportunity but
[00:33:33] [SPEAKER_03]: not to worry about replacement well and and think about it like this every technology
[00:33:40] [SPEAKER_03]: from the steam engine to the wheel to the incline plane right every technology that has
[00:33:48] [SPEAKER_03]: ever been invented and deployed by humankind was it was feared in the beginning was going to
[00:33:55] [SPEAKER_03]: eliminate human jobs and responsibilities but what happened in the end was it allowed the
[00:34:00] [SPEAKER_03]: people who have that responsibility to be more productive get more done with the same amount
[00:34:05] [SPEAKER_03]: of effort and resource and to focus on what's new what's next what's even more valuable
[00:34:12] [SPEAKER_03]: and it's exactly what you say what's more valuable is the human dynamic and that's just not something
[00:34:20] [SPEAKER_03]: that we have figured out how to program program into software can it happen at some point in the
[00:34:28] [SPEAKER_03]: future sure I'm a technology optimist I believe technology will do phenomenal things that we
[00:34:35] [SPEAKER_03]: can't yet imagine but not in your career time frame right like not mine not yours what it will be is a
[00:34:43] [SPEAKER_03]: tool that makes us better but you know what if you have a tool and you just deploy it and you don't
[00:34:48] [SPEAKER_03]: know how to use it effectively you've heard me say this before right my my old example is you
[00:34:54] [SPEAKER_03]: give me the world's best table saw and I'm less likely to use that very sophisticated implement
[00:35:01] [SPEAKER_03]: to make you some heirloom quality furniture than I am to cut off my own thumbs right because I don't
[00:35:06] [SPEAKER_03]: know how to use that tool that's not what I do AI is exactly the same thing do not expect it to do
[00:35:12] [SPEAKER_03]: your job be a conscientious adopter and a professional at using that tool it'll make you
[00:35:20] [SPEAKER_03]: better but if you assume I can just replace a person with that tool and it'll be good enough
[00:35:27] [SPEAKER_03]: you know what just tell me who you who your customers are because I'd like to follow up and
[00:35:32] [SPEAKER_03]: maybe have a customer support conversation and Ryan I'm not gonna give you a table saw I won't
[00:35:38] [SPEAKER_02]: give you a table saw so I think we covered that one I want to address a couple of trio of questions
[00:35:44] [SPEAKER_02]: from YouTube this time I'm going to paraphrase them a little bit because not sure 7874 asked
[00:35:50] [SPEAKER_02]: three targeted questions about my if I was starting an msp video and I wanted to address them
[00:35:56] [SPEAKER_02]: first not sure wanted to know about my use of in tune and then my statement of remote control
[00:36:02] [SPEAKER_02]: tools based on into I want to take a moment and clarify my thinking when I'm talking about building
[00:36:08] [SPEAKER_02]: a person when I was thinking about the solution if I was building an msp today and where would
[00:36:13] [SPEAKER_02]: base my tool is is I would base my technology around into and I would use them as my rmm and
[00:36:20] [SPEAKER_02]: my thinking is that if there are other tools that I decide I need in the business they have to be
[00:36:28] [SPEAKER_02]: compatible with into I'm not necessarily saying you must include other tools what I'm saying is a
[00:36:34] [SPEAKER_02]: pre-requisite of adding tools is that they must be compatible with the solution into that I have
[00:36:41] [SPEAKER_02]: selected for this so that's what I'm thinking is it's not necessarily saying you definitely
[00:36:46] [SPEAKER_02]: need more tools what I'm saying is if I decide I need more tools as the business evolves they must
[00:36:53] [SPEAKER_02]: be compatible with into also I made a comment in the video about blocking competitors by offering
[00:37:00] [SPEAKER_02]: infrastructure services in this case I don't mean technically block them not sure took this to mean
[00:37:07] [SPEAKER_02]: in in tune specifically no absolutely not Microsoft is very explicit that you can't block people
[00:37:14] [SPEAKER_02]: you can't let you know you can't take them from allowing them to move to another client
[00:37:18] [SPEAKER_02]: what I'm saying is that I would make sure my new modern solution provider where remember my premise
[00:37:25] [SPEAKER_02]: is that I'm going to work very heavily in the productivity stack I'm going to make sure that
[00:37:31] [SPEAKER_02]: I offer infrastructure services and if I don't want to build those out and likely me Dave Sobel
[00:37:38] [SPEAKER_02]: does not want to do so I'm going to bring in a partner another msp that wants that work or
[00:37:43] [SPEAKER_02]: with more some of my more modern thinking on this is I would bring in a distributor
[00:37:47] [SPEAKER_02]: as part of this if you watch my future of distribution video I've got a whole section
[00:37:52] [SPEAKER_02]: on using how I would bring in distributors to fix to fill the holes in my offering
[00:37:58] [SPEAKER_02]: this is the way that I would do that and finally the third question not sure asked me was about
[00:38:04] [SPEAKER_02]: wanting Zapier integration I want to say that first off I was using Zapier as an example
[00:38:10] [SPEAKER_02]: I tend to like Zapier I use it in my own business as an integration platform but the key
[00:38:16] [SPEAKER_02]: is that I'm selecting tools that have modern API driven interfaces one of the things that we see
[00:38:23] [SPEAKER_02]: in a lot of older tools is that it is not something that is easy to link with with APIs
[00:38:29] [SPEAKER_02]: I was talking with a guest just this week and we mentioned the idea of working with line of
[00:38:35] [SPEAKER_02]: business applications for example there's a lot of EMR and dental practice ones for dentists
[00:38:40] [SPEAKER_02]: and what we want to make sure is we want to make sure that we can get to the data contained within
[00:38:44] [SPEAKER_02]: that but most legacy solutions don't have really good API's that allow us to pull that data
[00:38:52] [SPEAKER_02]: and so what we're looking for in modern solutions as much as possible
[00:38:56] [SPEAKER_02]: is that we're looking for those API driven ones that allow us to extract data and then do things
[00:39:03] [SPEAKER_02]: with it particularly in our own business as an MSP solution provider we're going to run our own
[00:39:10] [SPEAKER_02]: business on ones that are very modern now I want to make one last statement about this
[00:39:15] [SPEAKER_02]: I want to emphasize that I Dave Sobel and my role as host of the business of tech
[00:39:19] [SPEAKER_02]: do not spend a lot of time reviewing and selecting technical tools my job is not to
[00:39:26] [SPEAKER_02]: understand every intricacy of every RMM in the market it is instead to understand what those
[00:39:32] [SPEAKER_02]: companies are doing to take advantage of market opportunities where are they moving where are they
[00:39:39] [SPEAKER_02]: investing where do they believe their next growth opportunity is and advise on their business
[00:39:45] [SPEAKER_02]: strategies there's lots other great people out there in the MSP space that will help you with
[00:39:50] [SPEAKER_02]: tool selection when I talk about tools I'm doing so in a general sense in order to give you a
[00:39:57] [SPEAKER_02]: sense of why I might pick a particular category of tools and then I will use one as an example
[00:40:03] [SPEAKER_02]: not sure I hope that I'm going to post this in the YouTube video I hope this helps you with your
[00:40:07] [SPEAKER_02]: answers and we will continue to take questions online as much as possible Ryan this has been
[00:40:13] [SPEAKER_02]: great fun I appreciate you joining me for the Q&A discussions as well look forward to
[00:40:18] [SPEAKER_02]: having you on for future conversations absolutely thank you very much for having me sir
[00:40:24] [SPEAKER_02]: well Shreya Kushek of Rackspace is my guest on this coming weekend's episode in the interview we dive
[00:40:31] [SPEAKER_02]: into why sustainability matters but in this clip which I think is relevant to our conversation
[00:40:37] [SPEAKER_02]: today he talks about the AI framework that Rackspace uses here's a preview of that interview
[00:40:43] [SPEAKER_01]: three s's that we talked about symbiotic secure and sustainable is what we call
[00:40:49] [SPEAKER_01]: responsible AI right and for us as Rackspace we felt like you know what we're known for in the market
[00:40:58] [SPEAKER_01]: is we manage and run production workloads we've done that for 25 plus years right we know how these
[00:41:06] [SPEAKER_01]: systems run in production and we're trying to bring that expertise to customers to say let us implement
[00:41:14] [SPEAKER_01]: those AI solutions that are responsible in these and meet these three criteria that I just talked
[00:41:21] [SPEAKER_02]: about that's that's kind of what we do now it's a cool fascinating conversation about how Rackspace
[00:41:27] [SPEAKER_02]: is using AI but also how they're leaning into sustainability and what they're doing in terms
[00:41:33] [SPEAKER_02]: of that benefits and you can understand that as a data center provider they think a lot about
[00:41:38] [SPEAKER_02]: energy usage now my patreon supporters already have this video if you want to listen to it now
[00:41:43] [SPEAKER_02]: you can support the show at patreon.com slash msp radio and get access to that video right now
[00:41:50] [SPEAKER_02]: and all my interview episodes early it'll drop on the weekend on youtube and the podcast feed
[00:41:56] [SPEAKER_02]: you're interested I encourage you to go listen to it now I want to thank salesbuilder who's
[00:42:08] [SPEAKER_02]: the power of automation and visit them at salesbuilder.com that's buildr.com and vendors you too can get
[00:42:17] [SPEAKER_02]: your name mentioned on the live show it's a simple monthly subscription visit patreon.com slash msp radio
[00:42:24] [SPEAKER_02]: to learn more and if you're listening this you can support the show most easily by just liking
[00:42:30] [SPEAKER_02]: sharing and following on your favorite platforms that is the number one thing that makes a
[00:42:36] [SPEAKER_02]: difference in the production and value of this show make sure you tell a colleague if you want to
[00:42:42] [SPEAKER_02]: support directly and get access to those videos early you can support with our give what you want
[00:42:47] [SPEAKER_02]: model you set what you think the content is worth and you can visit patreon.com slash msp radio
[00:42:53] [SPEAKER_02]: to sign up if you have a question and you're listening to the recording send it in at question
[00:42:59] [SPEAKER_02]: at msp radio.com really appreciate you joining me for the business of tech lounge
[00:43:04] [SPEAKER_02]: and I will see you next time

