Today's episode of the podcast covers the challenges IT teams face with burnout due to a war room incident management approach. A study by Dynatrace reveals how blame culture and disconnected teams contribute to this issue. The episode also discusses a decline in remote job postings on LinkedIn despite the demand for work flexibility and highlights gender equality views among tech professionals.
Three things to know today
00:00 Combating Burnout: IT Teams Suffer Under 'War-Room' Incident Management Tactics
04:22 LinkedIn Data Shows Decline in Remote Job Postings Amid Ongoing Demand for Work Flexibility
08:08 Nigel Frank Study Highlights Discrepancy in Gender Equality Views Among Tech Professionals
Supported by:
https://huntress.com/mspradio/
💼 All Our Sponsors
Support the vendors who support the show:
👉 https://businessof.tech/sponsors/
🚀 Join Business of Tech Plus
Get exclusive access to investigative reports, vendor analysis, leadership briefings, and more.
👉 https://businessof.tech/plus
🎧 Subscribe to the Business of Tech
Want the show on your favorite podcast app or prefer the written versions of each story?
📲 https://www.businessof.tech/subscribe
📰 Story Links & Sources
Looking for the links from today’s stories?
Every episode script — with full source links — is posted at:
🎙 Want to Be a Guest?
Pitch your story or appear on Business of Tech: Daily 10-Minute IT Services Insights:
💬 https://www.podmatch.com/hostdetailpreview/businessoftech
🔗 Follow Business of Tech
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/28908079
YouTube: https://youtube.com/mspradio
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/businessof.tech
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mspradio
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@businessoftech
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mspradionews
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
[00:00:00] Wednesday, March 27, 2024, and I'm Dave Solt, three things to know today. Combanding
[00:00:08] burnout IT teams suffer under a war room incident management set of tactics, LinkedIn data
[00:00:14] shows a decline in remote job postings, mid-ongling demand for work flexibility, and Nigel Frank's
[00:00:21] study highlights discrepancy in gender equality views among tech professionals. This is the
[00:00:27] Business of Tech.
[00:00:28] Today's episode is supported by Huntress, you want to focus on your clients and are always
[00:00:35] looking for ways to get more time. Use Huntress's fully-managed Cybersecurity platform to
[00:00:42] fight off cyber threats. Huntress is more than cybersecurity software for endpoints and
[00:00:47] identities, it's a 24 by 7 security operations center, its security awareness training,
[00:00:53] community engagement, and dedicated partner support with an average CSAT score of 99.3%.
[00:01:01] Technology can only get you so far, human expertise is what's needed to truly elevate
[00:01:06] and protect small businesses and you get that with Huntress.
[00:01:11] Secure your clients and help them thrive with the number 1 rated EDR for SMBs on G2. Visit
[00:01:17] Huntress.com slash MSB Radio to find out more.
[00:01:23] We use a lot of combat terminology for security, maybe that's not such a good idea.
[00:01:29] According to a study by Dynatrace, a war room style approach to incident management,
[00:01:34] lane culture and disconnected IT teams are causing burnout among IT staff. The study found
[00:01:40] the 91% of organizations still play the blame game with IT service providers after serious
[00:01:45] incidents, leading to fractured relationships and hampering the ability to respond to emerging
[00:01:50] threats. This reliance on war rooms style meetings has left 49% of IT teams feeling burnt
[00:01:56] out with 46% admitting to missing personal time. The increasing stress has led 21% of professionals
[00:02:03] to consider switching job roles or even careers. Dynatrace suggests that this approach not
[00:02:09] only fails to remediate issues, also damages office culture and exacerbates skill shortages.
[00:02:17] No before has released its 2024 Security Culture Report, which examines the impact of cybersecurity
[00:02:22] measures on organizations at their employees. Dynatrace reveals that the overall security
[00:02:27] culture score globally remains at a low moderate level with smaller organizations performing
[00:02:33] better than larger ones. Industries such as insurance financial services and banking, lead
[00:02:39] and security culture, while government, manufacturing and education sectors struggle. And from
[00:02:45] Axios, many healthcare professionals affected by the hack of a United Health Group subsidiary
[00:02:50] are uncertain if their cyber-attack insurance will cover their losses. Cyber insurance
[00:02:55] plans may not provide adequate protection when providers are affected by attacks on third
[00:03:00] party vendors. Some providers may have been underinsured or unable to afford coverage due
[00:03:06] to rising cyber insurance rates. Surveys show that only about 15% of companies have standalone
[00:03:12] insurance plans for cyber-attacks, large health systems estimated losses above $100 million
[00:03:19] per day, while smaller providers may have limited coverage that all short the actual damage.
[00:03:26] Why do we care? Ear-rim approach characterized by high stress, blame-oriented tactics is not
[00:03:32] only ineffective, actively harmful. The significant percentage of IT staff being burnt out and
[00:03:38] considering career changes highlights an urgent need for a shift towards more constructive
[00:03:44] and empathetic incident management strategies. An organization that masters this approach will
[00:03:49] have more at long term viability. Cyber insurance is undergoing a reckoning, the uncertainty
[00:03:55] faced by providers of other coverage, it's a gap in the current cybersecurity market,
[00:04:00] the policies may not fully account for the complexities of digital supply chains and
[00:04:04] the interconnected nature of those risks. This gap compounded by rising insurance rate
[00:04:09] and the under-preparedness of some organizations points to a critical area for reform and how
[00:04:15] cyber risks are assessed, insured, and managed. Gaps are opportunities of course.
[00:04:21] I had to note this one, recessions have been found to extend people's lives with age-adjusted
[00:04:30] mortality rates dropping during economic downturns. The Great Recession for example resulted in
[00:04:35] longer lives for Americans particularly for adults over 64 and those without a college education.
[00:04:41] The surprising reason behind this is the reduction in air pollution during recessions as few
[00:04:47] are people try to work and overall activity decreases. Cleaner air was responsible for more
[00:04:53] than a third of the decline in mortality during the Great Recession. This research highlights
[00:04:58] the trade-offs between economic activity and mortality, emphasizing the need to find a balance
[00:05:03] between growth and social welfare. And how about a counterpoint to last week's shorter
[00:05:09] work week proposal? According to Liberty Vertint, a professor at Data Science studies that support
[00:05:15] the benefits of a shorter work week are flawed and unreliable. She highlighted statistical flaws in
[00:05:21] limitations in popularly cited studies such as the failure to mention additional costs incurred
[00:05:26] by the Icelandic government and the lack of randomization in assigning workers.
[00:05:31] Retard also noted that no study has documented long-term productivity increases due to short
[00:05:37] and work weeks, while multiple studies have shown negative impacts on a country's GDP.
[00:05:42] Mandating shorter work weeks in the U.S. could have unseen effects on workers,
[00:05:47] potentially leading to a divide between the rich and poor and an increase in part-time unemployment.
[00:05:53] According to a report by TechSmithCourt, three out of four workers haven't received
[00:05:58] training for flexible work arrangements indicating that most employers haven't adapted their
[00:06:03] practices to support the shift to flexible work. The pandemic forced organizations into hybrid
[00:06:08] work without considering how to support new practices. Access to flexibility varies based on
[00:06:14] position and generation. Managers may not be as effective as they think in relating to their
[00:06:19] remote workers. HR professionals also face challenges in conducting remote HR functions,
[00:06:25] leading to increased total of rates and employee burnout.
[00:06:29] Those jobs may be disappearing. According to new data from LinkedIn, the share of remote positions
[00:06:34] posted on the job site has plummeted in the last 12 months. Despite this, there's a high demand
[00:06:39] for remote work among applicants. According to the BBC, U.S. salaries for fully-in-office jobs are
[00:06:47] surging, with companies offering an average of $82,000 and $37 for such roles by March 2024.
[00:06:54] An increase of over 33% compared to 2023. This trend is driven by the push for workers to return
[00:07:01] to pre-pandemic office schedules and compensate for the loss of flexibility. In contrast,
[00:07:06] the availability of remote work in the UK and Europe means the in-person premium is expected
[00:07:11] to be weaker. However, the salary discrepancy may reinforce labor market inequities as those with
[00:07:18] caring responsibilities predominantly women may be forced to give up higher paying opportunities.
[00:07:25] Why do we care? Companies that offer flexibility will attract top talent and benefit from a
[00:07:30] larger talent pool. Employers who remain remote first have the advantage of accessing a diverse
[00:07:36] range of skilled individuals. This is a more challenging and the lack of preparedness points to those
[00:07:42] realities. The increasing salary premium for in-office work, especially in the context of companies
[00:07:48] encouraging a return to those office schedules highlights the tension between flexibility and compensation.
[00:07:55] I continue to appreciate this opportunity due to the flexibility itself. There's more than one
[00:08:00] solution and needs to be matched to an organization. That's right area for both disruption and
[00:08:07] differentiation. A study from Nigel Frank International found that four-and-five male tech professionals
[00:08:15] believed men and women are treated equally in the tech industry, contradicting previous research.
[00:08:21] However, research from the FOSSA society revealed that nearly a quarter of women in tech
[00:08:26] have reported experiencing sexism in the workplace. The study emphasizes the need for male
[00:08:32] ally ship and suggest creating environments where women can openly share their experiences
[00:08:37] and be supported in leadership roles. A quarter of workers feel that generative AI tools could
[00:08:43] drive women out of the workforce according to research from code first girls. The use of AI in
[00:08:49] the workplace is widespread with many using it to improve productivity. However, concerns arise
[00:08:54] over the potential impact on female staff and the potential bias and discrimination in AI models.
[00:09:01] Crucial for businesses to prioritize diversity in tech teams to build effective and inclusive AI
[00:09:06] models. AI recruitment tools have also faced criticism from bias with examples of disproportionate
[00:09:13] favoring of men. Gender bias in large language models has also been identified. While some argue that
[00:09:19] AI can reduce bias in recruitment, others caution that it can increase uniformity rather than
[00:09:25] diversity. Why do we care? The majority of male tech professionals believing that gender equality
[00:09:31] has been achieved in the tech industry, starkly contrasting with the reports from women experiencing
[00:09:37] sexism at work. The divergence points to a lack of awareness or acknowledgement of the
[00:09:41] challenges women face in the tech sector, including barriers to entry, progression and a
[00:09:47] sometimes hostile work environment. That's a key insight for leaders.
[00:09:54] Looking to reach an audience of thousands of MSPs and IT service providers, put your ad right here
[00:10:01] on the business of tech and be on the show that 64% of MSPs report having listened to.
[00:10:07] A recurring top 50 tech news podcast, there are affordable options for you to reach our audience
[00:10:13] and we can support any budget. Podcast listeners are more engaged, have a higher level of
[00:10:19] brand retention and are more willing to listen to ads here than any other avenues.
[00:10:26] Want to know more? There's information at mspradio.com slash engage, including a button to book a time
[00:10:33] to talk. Go forward to that discussion.
[00:10:37] Thanks for listening, it's National Spanish Pia dey and it's also International Whiskey Day.
[00:10:45] Sounds like dinner is sorted. Have a question you want answered? We take those
[00:10:49] lists or questions, send them, idlis, a voice member or video to question at mspradio.com
[00:10:55] and if you want to comment on the stories, put it in the comment if you're on YouTube
[00:10:58] or reach out on LinkedIn if you're listening to the podcast. Talk to you again,
[00:11:03] tour. The business of tech is written and produced by me Dave Sobel under ethics guidelines
[00:11:10] posted at businessof.tech. If you like the content, please make sure to hit that like button,
[00:11:16] follow or subscribe. It's free and easy and the best way to support the show and help us grow.
[00:11:22] You can also check out our Patreon where you can join the business of tech community at patreon.com
[00:11:29] slash mspradio or by our why do we care merch at businessof.tech. Finally, if you're interested
[00:11:37] in advertising on this show, visit mspradio.com slash engage. Once again, thanks for listening to me
[00:11:44] and I will talk to you again on our next episode of the business of tech.
[00:11:51] Part of the mspradio network

